第八号当铺
1至7月河北经济总体平稳 发展向新向优_我的网站
一 |
在安平县丝网集团共享智造中试工厂，机械臂在进行焊接。
China saw robust exports in electric vehicles (EV), lithium batteries and photovoltaic products, known as the "new three," in the first half of this year. More notably, robotics, artificial intelligence (AI) and innovative drugs, which represent the future direction of industrial development, are also emerging as new calling cards for China's foreign trade.
However, the impressive performance provoked unease among some Western media outlets and politicians. Some have deliberately portrayed China's rapid industrial development and strong competitiveness as a result of government subsidies, pushing the false claim that subsidies have created overcapacity and those low-priced Chinese products are flooding global markets. Such fallacies, which simply equate industrial subsidies with overcapacity, are not only logically flawed but also factually groundless.
In practice, many countries adopt industrial policies tailored to their national conditions and development needs, such as providing research and development (R&D) subsidies for emerging industries and risk related subsidies for agriculture.
Well-designed industrial subsidies can help address market failures, promote technological innovation and environmental protection, reduce poverty and support balanced development, rather than cause so called "overcapacity."
Multiple reports by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development have noted that the number of industrial policies worldwide has grown rapidly over the past five years, with R&D subsidies, tax incentives and low interest loans for emerging industries becoming common international practices.
Forcibly linking industrial subsidies to "overcapacity" is, in essence, a political manipulation based on double standards. The US, for example, plans to provide $750 billion in various subsidies from 2022 to 2031 under its Inflation Reduction Act. Subsidized EVs are subject to requirements such as production and sales in the US or North America, effectively excluding other WTO members. US industrial subsidies for AI are even greater than those of all other countries combined.
Similarly, according to incomplete statistics, the European Commission is expected to provide more than 1.44 trillion euros ($210 billion) in various subsidies between 2021 and 2030. The EU's Industrial Accelerator Act links local content directly to financial support through "Made in EU" requirements, creating serious investment barriers and institutional discrimination.
Have these massive subsidies been labeled as causing "overcapacity"? The answer is no. While claiming that China's industrial subsidies lead to so-called overcapacity, these countries are themselves providing massive subsidies to their own industries. Such double standards amount to selective accusations targeting China, aimed at politicizing trade and economic issues and weaponizing industrial policy.
At a deeper level, accusations that "China's industrial subsidies cause overcapacity" are merely a pretext, reflecting growing anxiety and fear over the rising competitiveness of Chinese industries.
Looking back at the repeated hype in Western media, the criticism has consistently targeted China's most globally competitive industries, including new-energy vehicles, photovoltaics and power batteries. This exposes the real intention of shifting the blame for their own lagging industrial development onto China while stepping up restrictions against Chinese industries.
China's breakthroughs in these industries have been driven by advances in homegrown technologies, complete industrial and supply chains, and robust market competition, rather than by policy subsidies as some have claimed.
In recent years, China has taken multiple steps to regulate and improve its subsidy policies, from reviewing and correcting inappropriate local subsidies to exploring a unified negative list mechanism for local fiscal subsidies. China applies subsidies equally to all market entities, including foreign invested enterprises, strictly follows WTO rules, and continues to improve the compliance, effectiveness and transparency of its subsidy policies.
Rather than fabricating and hyping baseless claims about subsidies and obsessing over building trade barriers, certain Western media outlets and politicians should focus on addressing their own weaknesses and increasing investment in research and development. They should embrace healthy market competition with an inclusive mindset, promote mutual benefit through greater openness, and win markets and drive progress through genuine innovation.
This was compiled and translated by the Global Times English edition based on an article published in the "Chisu Jinsheng" economic commentary column of the People's Daily on August 10, 2026.
。马子涵 摄长城网·冀云客户端讯（记者 刘朋朋）8月21日，省统计局发布1至7月份经济运行情况。
二 | 数据显示，前7个月，全省经济运行呈现总体平稳、向新向优发展态势，新动能加速成长。工业生产运行平稳。
三 | 1至7月份，全省规模以上工业增加值同比增长5.5%。规模以上工业统计的40个行业大类中，28个行业实现增长，增长面为70.0%。其中，仪器仪表制造业增加值增长52.4%，有色金属矿采选业增长23.9%，医药制造业增长12.5%，汽车制造业增长9.7%，铁路船舶航空航天和其他运输设备制造业增长11.8%。固定资产投资持续增长。1至7月份，全省固定资产投资同比增长0.3%。大项目支撑作用明显，10亿元以上建设项目完成投资增长5.5%，拉动全省投资增长2.3个百分点。工业投资增长6.3%，工业技改投资增长10.1%，分别拉动全省投资增长2.0和1.6个百分点。
四 | 大规模设备更新政策持续发力显效，设备工器具购置投资增长34.0%。
五 | 消费品市场规模平稳扩大。1至7月份，全省限额以上单位消费品零售额2944.0亿元，同比增长4.9%。消费品以旧换新政策持续显效，文化办公用品类、家用电器和音像器材类、通讯器材类商品零售额分别增长90.7%、19.8%和16.6%。
六 | 升级类商品零售回升，化妆品类、体育娱乐用品类、金银珠宝类商品零售额分别增长8.0%、3.9%和2.9%，比上半年加快2.5、3.5和0.5个百分点。新动能加快培育壮大。1至7月份，全省规模以上工业战略性新兴产业增加值增长11.1%，快于规模以上工业增速5.6个百分点。其中，光电子器件制造增加值增长3.4倍，集成电路制造增长40.2%，高铁车组制造增长23.4%，风能原动设备制造增长13.2%。高新技术产业增加值同比增长7.5%，快于规上工业增速2.0个百分点。光电子器件、集成电路、锂离子电池等新产品产量快速增长，分别增长79.7%、57.4%和87.0%。高技术产业投资增长17.3%。
Current article:http://l6pq.cuancuguanzhongnieqinyazhun.cyou/cq1rhng/j6xo.html
Published on:00:45:40